THE RULES OF THE GAME AND ECONOMIC RECOVERY

 The following is an excerpt adapted from a lecture given at Hillsdale College on February 2, 2010 during a conference on the New Deal. The author is Amity Shlaes, a syndicated columnist for Bloomberg and a senior fellow in economic history at the Council on Foreign Relations.

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Relevance for Today

It is not hard to see some of today’s troubles as a repeat of the errors of the 1930s. There is arrogance up top. The federal government is dilettantish with money and exhibits disregard and even hostility to all other players. It is only as a result of this that economic recovery seems out of reach.

The key to recovery, now as in the 1930s, is to be found in property rights. These rights suffer under our current politics in several ways. The mortgage crisis, for example, arose out of a long-standing erosion of the property rights concept—first on the part of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but also on that of the Federal Reserve. Broadening FDR’s entitlement theories, Congress taught the country that home ownership was a “right.” This fostered a misunderstanding of what property is. The owners didn’t realize what ownership entailed—that is, they didn’t grasp that they were obligated to deliver on the terms of the contract of their mortgage. In the bipartisan enthusiasm for making everyone an owner, our government debased the concept of home ownership.

Property rights are endangered as well by the ongoing assault on contracts generally. A perfect example of this was the treatment of Chrysler bonds during the company’s bankruptcy, where senior secured creditors were ignored, notwithstanding the status of their bonds under bankruptcy law. The current administration made a political decision to subordinate those contracts to union demands. That sent a dangerous signal for the future that U.S. bonds are not trustworthy.

Three other threats to property loom. One is tax increases, such as the coming expiration of the Bush tax cuts. More taxes mean less private property. A second threat is in the area of infrastructure. Stimulus plans tend to emphasize infrastructure—especially roads and railroads. And after the Supreme Court’s Kelo decision of 2005, the federal government will have enormous license to use eminent domain to claim private property for these purposes. Third and finally, there is the worst kind of confiscation of private property: inflation, which excessive government spending necessarily encourages. Many of us sense that inflation is closer than the country thinks.

If the experience of the Great Depression teaches anything, it is that property rights must be firmly established or else we will not have the kind of economic activity that leads to strong recovery. Economic growth depends on the impulse of the small businessman and entrepreneur to get back in the game. In order for this to happen, we don’t need a perfect government. All we need is one that is “not too bad,” whose rules are not constantly changing and snuffing out the willingness of these players to take risks. We need a government under which the money supply doesn’t change unpredictably.

Recovery won’t happen from the top. But when those at the top step back and create the proper conditions, it will happen.


 

Reprinted by permission from Imprimus, a publication of Hillsdale College.

Share

12 comments for “THE RULES OF THE GAME AND ECONOMIC RECOVERY

  1. HarryFNamekin
    January 9, 2011 at 4:04 am

    There is a particular familiarity about a number of the comments here, nevertheless I suppose that individuals just about all tend to return to cliches at the end of the day.

  2. Benjamin Yong
    January 7, 2011 at 9:32 am

    I just want to say that, when i first came across this weblog, it just blew me away! It’s difficult to see such informative and honest weblog posts like this one nowadays. Bookmarked and liked!

  3. Camille
    December 13, 2010 at 9:13 am

    Christ is wonderful

  4. December 8, 2010 at 4:42 am

    Thank you so much, there aren’t enough posts on this… or at least i cant find them. I am turning into such a blog nut, I just cant get enough and this is such an important topic… i’ll be sure to write something about your site

  5. November 29, 2010 at 4:16 am

    Hey there this is a fantastic post. I’m going to e-mail this to my pals. I came on this while exploring on aol I’ll be sure to come back. thanks for sharing.

  6. Lamonica Scicchitano
    November 18, 2010 at 8:47 pm

    I’ve read some good stuff here. Definitely worth bookmarking for revisiting.

  7. November 17, 2010 at 6:22 am

    This is very intresting, You are a very skilled blogger. I have joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your great post.

  8. November 16, 2010 at 1:32 am

    I’ve read some good stuff here. Definitely worth bookmarking for revisiting.

  9. November 15, 2010 at 4:43 am

    Brilliant blog posting. I found your post very interesting, I think you are a brilliant writer. I added your blog to my bookmarks and will return in the future.

  10. Andrei Piele
    October 23, 2010 at 8:37 am

    I just love your site, it’s filled with fresh and relevant articles and have a very nice eye catchy design! Some posts really helped me in my work, so thanks for that!! Thumbs up

  11. October 22, 2010 at 3:11 am

    Superb post ,I really like it. thanks for bringing freshness in this topic. admin I have read a lot of articles but nothing with the recent updates about this topic. Your article came as a great help.Thanks

  12. Lisa Tandarts
    October 19, 2010 at 3:14 pm

    Hello thanks for this very good post. But I still do not understand the third part though!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *