Sioux Militant Robert Packard Says “NO” to Welfare
Being too immersed in your native culture keeps people from seeing the forest for the trees. Novelist James Joyce had to leave his native Ireland for a sojourn in Switzerland to finally get a perspective on what was happening back home.
Similarly, Yankton Sioux tribal member Robert Packard left South Dakota several years ago with the US Army, but then decided to stay in the Berlin area as an expatriate artist, reminiscent of the “Lost Genenation” writers like Ernest Hemingway and Ezra Pound who settled in Paris after World War I.
The Germans, of course, already had a long-standing tradition of idealizing the American Indian in the works of men like Karl May, whose popular Winnetou novels (1890s) drew from even earlier French novels that praised the primitivism of life in the unadorned natural world, such as Chateaubriand’s novel Atala (1801) based on his North American travels.
European readers couldn’t get enough. America was about Indians, not about cowboys. Thoreau would have understood. Robert Packard stepped up to the German plate to satisfy this cultural appetite. But he soon found that being lionized as a minority celebrity isn’t the same as being given full-fledged acceptance.
As Berliner Seymour Gris has written in “Sioux Indian found guilty of Nazi salute,” Packard’s marginal status began to get worse as his former benefactors began to turn against him, causing him to lose his livelihood and means of daily support.
Packard’s feeble protest of using the Nazi salute against his enemies had momentarily forgotten that Germany today isn’t based on freedom of speech. Contrary political points of view can simply be made illegal. The law then can be selectively enforced–and is therefore arbitrary. “In America, there is something called the spirit of the law. This law was enacted to prevent the return of the Nazi party to power. I’m an American Indian,” he says. Forget about context if they want to bring someone down.
Despite being almost homeless in Berlin, Packard has refused all forms of public or Hartz IV welfare. “I’ve never taken a cent in government money in my life, and never will,” he says. Begun by former Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, Hartz IV has been criticized for promoting a demeaning form of welfare that keeps workers locked into low-paying jobs while simultaneously collecting public assistance.
Packard suggests that he is in the forefront of emerging American Indian militants who believe that cultural salvation will only come once the onus of government dependency has been shed. Government has been the effective “caretaker” of tribes since their defeat in the nineteenth century. As Henry Ford once pointed out, things like poverty, alcoholism, joblessness are the continuing legacy of this welfare dependency.
Both Packard and Ford would likely agree with Ronald Reagan that “Government’s first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives.”
The title of the article is suggestive but supports other statements such those doubtless made by Rob, that “he is in the forefront of emerging American Indian militants who believe that cultural salvation will only come once the onus of government dependency has been shed”. Being so would mean that you have to actively be participating with other natives towards this end. As a native who is, and is a friend of Rob’s and have helped him as I could through this absolute farcical travesty on the part of the German government and the group who targeted him, I got the call the day it happened. Ford, you can “Google me”, but as a news correspondent for a native news source and writer, I have written on similar topics frequently.
ive known roberet packsrd for many years- this story I see now does not ring true-I have serious questions! rober conact Daniel and sandy lets see whats what -we have contacts.
Thanks for the feedback, Danny. Would love to know more about what doesn’t seem to “ring true.” Did Seymour Gris get something wrong? Good that you have “serious questions,” but please give us a hint about what they may be.
via email from a reader
That’s interesting. I’ve always maintained that the government needs to *give* them the land they’re on (or sell it to them at a dollar an acre), mineral rights and all, versus holding it in a “trust” as the government supposedly does. Even as a “company town”, each tribe would figure out pretty fast how to become little Vegas/little Switzerland/little Saudi, plus the value of education, Constitutional protections, etc, etc.