In The Courtroom With Annette Bosworth

A very dignified and composed Annette Bosworth faces her accusers.

annette

The accusers, Attorney General Marty Jackley’s team of lawyers, spent the entire first day of the trial establishing the “facts” of their case.  This seemed to those in the courtroom to be serious overkill, since attorneys for Bosworth had already stipulated to those facts in the first few minutes of the trial.  As I sat watching, it was hard not to HCR adwonder about the intensity with which the Jackley team attacked Bosworth in their attempt to convict her of 12 felony charges over petition errors which her defense maintain were “honest mistakes”.

It was also hard to wonder where Jackley was when then Republican Speaker of the House Brian Gosh purposely violated the law by notarizing his own signatures on his own petitions.   Nothing. No consequence.  The Attorney General did not marshal a team of lawyers and engage the director of the DCI to launch an investigation.  There was no consequence whatsoever, even though Gosh is an attorney himself and should reasonably have known better.

Why this obvious double standard?  Many other “good Republicans” have also been guilty of similar petition violations.  No consequences.

I personally don’t think Gosh should have been prosecuted for a felony.  Perhaps a misdemeanor and a small fine.  I also don’t think Bosworth should be charged with TWELVE… count them, TWELVE felonies with the possible penalty of 24 years in prison, $48,000.00 in fines and the loss of her license to practice medicine.

Facts are facts.  Bosworth and her team stipulated (agreed) to the facts in the first minutes of the trial.  But the “facts” are not really what this trial is all about.  This trial is about an Attorney General who has pursued a political novice with a vengeance.  The same Attorney General who simply “looked the other way” when a prominent, experienced lawyer and politician willfully and knowingly violated the law on his petitions.

Marty Jackley should be the one on trial.  He should be on trial for having a double standard as his version of “justice”.  He should be on trial for significant prosecutorial over-reach, political favoritism and abuse of power as Attorney General.

I suggest he would be found guilty.

***Gordon Howie is an author and CEO of Life and Liberty Media***

gh 4     “It’s not about right or left, it’s about Right or Wrong.”

We need your help:

  • Pray
  • Make a small (or large) donation
  • “friend” me on facebook for daily updates
  • SHARE the articles on this site with your network
Share

2 comments for “In The Courtroom With Annette Bosworth

  1. Conservative
    May 21, 2015 at 9:20 am

    Bosworth is guilty, she should have been able to plead out to misdemeanor charges.

    Marty Jackley has shown that he will throw the weight os his office behind going after political opponents and he will use his office to protect cronies. He is unfit for office.

  2. Lars Aanning
    May 21, 2015 at 8:24 am

    “They” are out to take away Dr, Bosworth’s license to practice medicine in South Dakota…and the election petition was their lame excuse for prosecuting this doctor…the office of the attorney general is being pushed to prosecute…since the attorney general’s office is the legal arm of the licensing board (SDBMOE), and since every member (including the physicians) of the SDBMOE is hand-picked by the governor, there is no limit to the conflicting relations between all the protagonists supporting the prosecution…and the totalitarian mind-set of the prosecution has virtually silenced the supporters of Dr. Bostworth…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *