Jackley’s Dog Ate The Complaint

South Dakota’s Attorney General says he isn’t doing anything on  the alleged Hickey petition violations…

Image result for poodle

Because he “doesn’t have a complaint.”

That is his response from June 18th.  Really???  Here is a copy of a a complaint sent to him on JUNE 4th.Complaint AG

There seems to be a pattern developing here with regard to “misinformation” coming from the Attorney General.  Maybe his dog ate the complaint.  Maybe not.

I am not suggesting (or hoping) that Hickey is deserving of felony prosecution, even though the alleged violations are exactly the violations for which Jackly prosecuted Bosworth.  NEITHER HIGof these violations rise to the level of felonies.

What is very interesting is the significantly different way the Attorney General is treating this complaint.  It demonstrates the level of integrity the AG has (or does not have) in the dispensation of “justice”, and makes it clear to onlookers that he has abused his power in the over-prosecution of Bosworth while ignoring violations by other people.

Even the Secretary of States office handled the Bosworth complaint differently.  That office FORWARDED the Bosworth complaint to the AG, who dispatched a small army of “investigators” to interrogate petition signers.  The Hickey complaint is being treated quite differently.  The Secretary of State “responded” to the complainant, as follows, rather than forwarding it to the AG:waldron response snip

Now, the Attorney General “Doesn’t have a complaint” on the Hickey petitions.  Sorry Marty, one was sent to you weeks ago.  You can expect another one via Certified Mail soon.  This one will require a signature acknowledging receipt from you, or perhaps your dog.

It’s time for Marty Jackley to restore integrity to the election process… and his office.

***Gordon Howie is an author and CEO of Life and Liberty Media***

Gordon     “It’s not about right or left, it’s about Right or Wrong.”

 

 

 

We need your help:

  • Pray
  • Make a small (or large) donation
  • “friend” me on facebook for daily updates
  • SHARE the articles on this site with your network

 

 

 

 

Share

4 comments for “Jackley’s Dog Ate The Complaint

  1. Conservative
    June 19, 2015 at 1:23 pm

    Jackley and Daugaard have used their office to go after political opponents and protect their cronies.

    This is disgusting.

  2. Lars Aanning
    June 19, 2015 at 9:12 am

    Seems like an obvious double-standard…

  3. Lora Hubbel
    June 19, 2015 at 8:14 am

    According to our SD Constitution, Hickey MUST be treated the same way. Look at SD Bill of Rights,
    Article 6 § 18.
    Equal privileges or immunities. No law shall be passed granting to any citizen, class of citizens or corporation, privileges or immunities which upon the same terms shall not equally belong to all citizens or corporations.
    If they don’t want to charge Hickey with a felony…they better not charge Bosworth for doing the same thing. But it’s not really the same thing, Hickey was an established Politian who knew better.

  4. Kirby
    June 19, 2015 at 8:12 am

    Thanks for being our watchdog.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *