Promises, Promises…
Republicans in Congress are telling us they will fix the US Tax Code. Can we believe them? Let’s hope so.
But just what will they change? AND… will they make it better, or worse?
Former Presidential candidate, Steve Forbes, has been promoting a “flat tax” for years. It seems that no one is listening.
Maybe it’s time.
***Gordon Howie is an author and CEO of Life and Liberty Media***
“It’s not about right or left, it’s about Right or Wrong.”
Follow me on Twitter @GordonHowieSD
“friend” me on facebook for daily updates
See more about Texas Longhorn Cattle, Real Estate, Music and Politics at www.ghowie.com
Our mission is to promote Conservative Christian principles, help the hurting and provide truth and information to a lost and dying world.
In short, what I just posted in my previous comment is summed up this way.
• Why wait for Congress?
• Why trust in the promises of Congress?
• Why continue to be subject to all the benefits of paying taxes, fines and fees, when there is a solution for you to help yourself right now?
• Why wait on anyone else to do for you, what is well within your power to do for yourself?
•Remember, who is subject to the performance of those taxes, fines and fees, the “beloved” son, or the prodigal “stranger” son?
• Who do you say you are, and can you back that up with your DEEDS?
Until one learns what they need to learn and understand fully to achieve the great goal of being revested with their birthright inheritance and estate, and thereby become the source of money, [Accept the original deed, causing the civil death of the PERSON (SS NAME & NUMBER) by the collapse of the Trust it is administrated through (Social Insurance) thereby releasing the person from being under the administration of many-many statutes, codes, rules and regulations by government agents] no longer having to borrow money from another source, turning one into a voluntary surety, constitutor and slave of the one that they borrowed the money from…the Federal Reserve Bank. But, unfortunately, most of you will never take the time to do the research and study to learn why this is the remarkable solution. If it takes more than 30-seconds, it is ignored as attention spans last just about that long now anyway.
Nevertheless, there is what I would call an interim solution. This solution is to cease and desist using an open indorsement for the use of that currency, in other words, just a signature alone without any intent or purpose expressed. And, start using a limited indorsement that does express how and what your intent is using that PROPERTY that belongs to another so one does not voluntary walk into being a surety, constitutor and slave to another man and/or CORPORATION.
Yes, this solution is lawful and legal. But, most importantly, it will solve all of one’s problems with taxes, and it is solution others have already been using for quite some time without any problems. As for those of you who are already worried about this, even though you have done absolutely no study and research into this to know that it is not, or, that it is true, much less even stand on a valid foundation to voice a concern either way, the Supreme Court for the United States has indeed upheld this kind of, “Non-indorsement Indorsement,” not once, but twice.
What I am going to do is cite all the sources, then the rest is up to you. You either do your own research and study, or not. It makes no difference to me what you choose. I am already free from having to any of this anymore. But, as I pointed out, this is a very valid interim step that will cure the problem that so many face dealing with having to make use of currency that is issued by a private owner into the public.
First, if you do not yet understand that the NAME and NUMBER you are using is in fact PROPERTY OF THE STATE, then examine close what is written on the back of the Social Security Card. It plainly states on that card that you have to return if they ask you for it. In short, this means that you are not the owner, but mere user and agent for the property of that card. This implies automatic duties and obligations if you do make use of that property without property permission. Those duties and obligations are in fact given as BENEFITS in the form of paying taxes, fines and fees. Even jail time is a benefit. Really, if you never have been introduced to this understanding, the thought of it should make you sick to your stomach. By the mere use of this property without your expressed with to declare your intent and purpose, you just left that door wide open for assumption and presumption, and if you think for one moment that those who administrated that legal fiction of law are going to have your best interest at heart, then think again about all the taxes, fines, and fees you have to keep paying, over and over and over. Some benefit right? At least not for you, but most certainly for someone else.
Now, second, the non-indorsement indorsement is simply this, “DEMAND IS MADE FOR LAWFUL MONEY PURSUANT TO 12USC411.” That’s it! That is all that it is, and you do not need to put that demand with a signature, especially now that you know that name and number is not your property. This non-indorsement indorsement expresses your intent and purpose for HOW you choose to make use of the currency that is currently authorized for use by the government. You use this non-indorsement indorsement for all transactions of any kind, and if said transactions are being done via electronics only, then whatever the paperwork is that is submitted that authorizes such a transaction to be done, also use this very same non-indorsement indorsement.
Third, why do this? What is the difference? A Federal Reserve Note is the property of the Federal Reserve Bank. Therefore, it is private property of a private corporation. Contrary to popular misunderstanding the Federal Reserve Bank has nothing to do with the United States government. It simply is a private corporation doing business with the United States that has a lot of foreign interest driving what it does. If you do not use the non-indorsement indorsement, such as you most like are already, then all transactions automatically fall under the TAXABLE EVENT category as you are borrowing private credit from someone else. This is when you simply put a signature alone to whatever it is you are indorsing. However, if you do choose to use, “DEMAND IS MADE FOR LAWFUL MONEY PURSUANT TO 12USC411,” then you are legally and lawfully expressing your wish to not have that transaction be a registered as a taxable event. In other words, you want to be recognized NOT to be borrowing private currency even though you are still using the Federal Reserve Note. Let me explain.
The Federal Reserve Note exists in duality. This one note serves for two very distinct and individual purposes. One of them being for public debts, and the other being for private debts. The notes even say that as the phrase, “This note is legal tender for all debts public and private.” That notice is not there for decoration. That notice is telling the user that you have a choice as to how you want to make a use of that note. You have a choice. You can either allow that note to be recognized in its default state as private credit borrowed from the private corporation and bank, the Federal Reserve Bank. Or, you can change how that note is recognized from its default state to that is a PUBLIC CURRENCY.
Like I said, this difference is the difference between a taxable event, verses a non-taxable event. It is the difference between private credit, and public funds, and on those note are two very different and separate seals. One of the Federal Reserve System and one of the Treasury of the United States. Make no mistake about this folks, these two seals, with the notice, and even the two individual signatures are letting you know that you do have a choice as to HOW you want to make a use of the note, if that is all that you can do for the moment. But, DO NOT BELIEVE ME! Look at what the Treasury says of this on their own website about this very thing.
https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/Currency/Pages/legal-tender.aspx
Oh my, but they are telling you that the FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE also serves the purpose of a UNITED STATES NOTE. “United States notes serve no function that is not already adequately served by Federal Reserve notes. As a result, the Treasury Department stopped issuing United States notes, and none have been placed into circulation since January 21, 1971.” Read the entire webpage. There is nothing on that page that declares that the UNITED STATES NOTE has ceased to be circulated. It is saying that the UNITED STATES NOTE is circulated in the form of FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES. That is why Federal Reserve Notes exist in duality, and this very truth is plastered right on the front of the notes with two seals, two signatures, and a notice that explains it works for both public and private debts.
Furthermore, the Treasury’s website also gives notice to the fact that the authorization and authority for the printing of Federal Reserve Notes come from the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. In other words, prior to that the money only had one seal one it. The Treasury’s seal. Why should one still want to make use of that seal over and above the usurping seal of the Federal Reserve System? It seems pretty foolish if you do not.
In section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 is the clause that allows for the demand to be made for lawful money. That very clause was codified into Title 12 of the United States Code at section 411. Now, you understand why that cite is directly cited in the Non-indorsement indorsement. So, for those that keep worrying about if this is legal or not, actually take some time to not only stick your head into the law, but also the history that goes with the law so you can alleviate your unfounded and unsubstantiated worries based upon only emotion, and no solid evidence in rebuttal with cites to the contrary.
Now, if you are still skeptical then look up the two Supreme Court cases that affirm that these things are so. They are, US v RICKMAN, and US v. WARE.
http://openjurist.org/638/f2d/182/united-states-v-a-rickman (1980)
http://openjurist.org/282/f3d/902/united-states-v-ware (2002)
Oh, a quick sidebar note. All the courts changed from being the lawfully constitutional courts during what is referred to as the, “Switch-in-Time,” court cases from 1933-1937. In other words, because of this change, basically all previous court cases to 1937 no longer were applicable to the courts as they changed from a de jure court under article 3 to that of a defacto corporation courts administrating everything under an inferior law form from that which was originally created by the Forefathers of the great American Republic. Notice the recent dates of these two court cases being well after the change in the court system.
So then, it is up to each and every individual to either do for themselves, or not do for themselves. Even though I have given plenty of information, and sources, for one to start doing their own discovery. It is very important that one do their own discovery into these matter for their own benefit. Or, would you rather just keep continuing to accept the benefits of fines, fees and taxes, and not even do some research into this for the sake of your own benefit, and thereby taking way the benefits you are providing to others, such as the Class-A Federal Reserve Bank stock holders?
“He said, “Yes.” And when he had come into the house, Jesus anticipated him, saying, “What do you think, Simon? From whom do the kings of the earth take customs or taxes, from their sons or from strangers?” (Matthew 17:25)
Of course the kings of the earth collect taxes and customs (fines and fees) from the strangers. (The prodigal sons) So then, are you one of the strangers? Were you not, “…born of a woman UNDER the law?” Do you pay the taxes of the TAXPAYER? Do you not volunteer for those duties, obligations and responsibilities just as Simon Peter did, mistakenly? Or, are you one of the Sons who is free indeed, and not obligated to, “Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar, because of having volunteered by your borrowing of Federal Reserve Notes from Caesar’s private credit, without redeeming those notes into United States Notes?
Think about it! This is not difficult to understand. The only thing that will stop you is YOU, and your fear of what men can do. If you truly are walking in faith, then what do you have to fear, Christian? Well, are you supposed to fear what men can do, Christian? Are you? Do you really know what it means to walk by faith and not by sight? Do your deeds reflect that you are walking by faith and not by sight? You speak of having faith, but what do your deeds reveal about that claim?
The Son is free because the Son is finding his way back from being a prodigal son to a beloved son in whom the Father is well pleased. The lawful money demand is only but an interim step, it is not the complete and final step. But, it most certainly is one very brave and commendable step in the journey for one to be revested with their God-given birthright inheritance and estate.
The next step, is examplifed in why The Master (Jesus the Christ) turned over the tables for buying and selling in the temple. This is the parable that gives insight into how one will no longer need the use of private credit (foreign money) to do any transaction for property, as they will have reached a level of spiritual insight and self-governance with the ability to control their suretyship for the creation of all the credit needed to take of family and estate without the need of borrowing any foreign currency unto voluntary slavery, just as it should be.
One final word of encouragement. There are a few websites that have posted blogs and/or directly give more detail and examples of what I have just so briefly have posted herein this comment. These websites can be easily found by using keywords that I have used within this post. So then, if one is looking for more information to study and do research, it shall be no problem for you to find other resources to aid you on this journey…..and, a most worthy journey it is. Enjoy the journey for it is well worth the trip.