A Protection Racket Wrapped in a Cover-up

Some background to this part of the plot must include the fact that the former FBI Director James Comey has admitted to illegally leaking transcripts of privileged conversations with the President to the press.  Why did he do it?  Comey testified before a Senate Committee that he orchestrated the leak of accounts of conversations with President Donald Trump because he thought it might lead to the appointment of a special prosecutor to lead the Russia investigation.

In an interesting twist Deputy Attorney General, Rod J. Rosenstein in a memo to the President on May 9, 2017 after outlining the improper actions of James Comey with regard to the investigation of Hillary’s emails stated, “Although the President has the power to remove an FBI director, the decision should not be taken lightly. I agree with the nearly unanimous opinions of former Department officials. The way the Director handled the conclusion of the email investigation was wrong. As a result, the FBI is unlikely to regain public and congressional trust until it has a Director who understands the gravity of the mistakes and pledges never to repeat them. Having refused to admit his errors, the Director cannot be expected to implement the necessary corrective actions.”

Accepting this counsel President Trump fired FBI Director Comey.  Then Deputy Attorney General, Rod J. Rosenstein appointed Mueller as Special Counsel to investigate Trump based on his firing of Comey.

President Trump knows what’s going on.  In his famous tweet where he labeled Mueller’s fishing expedition a “Witch Hunt” he said “I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director!”

Mueller, who is up to his eyeballs in Hillary’s Russian scams, has weaponized criminal law in the convoluted attempt of the Progressive cult to misdirect the public.  The denizens of the swamp never expected Hillary to lose.  They never thought there was any chance of their nefarious and perhaps treasonous schemes to stack the deck and short circuit the electoral processes.  But in a shocking twist the electoral system designed by our founders worked and the united people out here in fly-over country were able to thwart the bi-coastal fix when the fix was supposedly in.

The gators, mosquitos, and apes of the swamp couldn’t abide this travesty.  So, the impartial Justice Department stepped in to claw back the reins of power from the great unwashed masses attempting to stage a revolution through the ballot box.   According to an analysis by The Hill, of the fourteen major federal agencies whose employees personally donated to presidential politics, “By the end of September 2016, about $1.9 million, or 95 percent, went to the Democratic nominee’s campaign.”  And an astounding ninety-four percent of DOJ employee donations were to Hillary.   Nothing to see here, no bias there, move along.

So far Mueller and his team of democrat donors have secured the indictment of Paul Manafort whose main crime may have been working in the Trump campaign.  Wait a minute how can you say that!  He wasn’t indicted for anything to do with Trump’s campaign.  No, he was indicted for tax fraud and lobbying violations.  Of course with the twisted and murky tax code that stretches to 73,954 pages.   Then again as the old saying concerning Grand Juries goes “Prosecutors could get them to indict a ham sandwich.”

As in any over-regulated state everyone is guilty of something they just haven’t decided to pick you up yet.  Let’s see if we give an ex-FBI chief an unlimited budget, a big Democrat donor staff, and our bewildering multitude of laws in America, they’ll eventually get anyone they want to much like a policeman following you for 1,000 miles.  Eventually he will find a reason to pull you over.

It isn’t even just a question of is this fair?  It comes down to a decision.  Is this the type of legal system we want in America?   Do we want to have the banana-republic type of kangaroo justice that indicts, arrests, and convicts people over their politics?

The information of Hillary and her minions in the State Department and the FBI regarding their lucrative dealings with Russia and their machinations to deprive Bernie of any chance to win the primaries spill out like garbage from a ruptured plastic bag.  And all the while we have the spectacle of those implicated by real evidence directing an investigation that goes nowhere and proves nothing.

A protection racket wrapped in a cover-up is playing out every day in the screaming headlines and impassioned screeds of the on-air teleprompter readers of the Corporations Once Known as the Mainstream Media.  The only real questions left are:

Will the establishment succeed in casting out the interloper?

Will they reverse the 2016 election and expose that we have devolved from a representative republic operating on democratic principles into a functioning oligarchy disguised as a non-functional democracy.

And there are two other questions that rattle around in my mind:

Who would Putin rather have as the president a totally corrupt political hack that everyone knows is for sale or a self-made billionaire that no one can bribe, whose energy mantra is “Drill Baby Drill” and whose platform is America First?

And if the Russians hacked the election and Hillary won the popular vote whose side were they on?  Evidently even the smartest woman in the world didn’t understand how the Electoral College works maybe the Russians didn’t either?